 |
|
|
| | IDEAS | | |
Egoism
Over
Altruism
by |
|
| 1.
definition of egoism and altruism Axiom of morality a. definition of primary morality b. definition of secondary morality c. definition of primary anti-morality d. definition of secondary anti-morality Conclusion: Primary morality and anti-morality as Egoistic, Secondary morality and anti-morality as Altruistic. 2. against altruism generally a. Role Forward as the default a priori state. b. Dependency of role reversal upon group. c. Altruists require coercion, egoists merely employ coercion. 3. religion as altruism a. the informational contribution of religion b. the reducibility of religion to number c. the observations, dictates, promises, and threats of every religion d. the goal of religion to produce altruistic persons 4. socialism as altruism and religion 5. political correctness as altruism socialism and religion 6. penumbral rights hallucination as altruism, political correctness and socialism 7. egoism, suprematism, dominance and will to power defined 8. anti-morality as a nonrevolutionary philosophy a. Nietzsche b. Machiavelli 9. egoism, suprematism and will to power as a dominant anti-morality. 1. The Definition of Egoism and Altruism: Egoism is the exercise of the will, identifying and realizing the goals claims and desires of oneself. Altruism is suppression of the will, identifying the goals, claims and desires of others. All morality is stochastic (goal seeking or goal averting) in nature. Primary morality is prescriptive behavior derived from nature (which is material and atomistic, and therefore indifferent and amoral). Primary morality emulates nature. Secondary morality is rebellion against or suppression of nature, which is indifferent and amoral. Primary anti-morality is the denial of moralities which violate the Primary morality. Secondary anti-morality is the rebellion against moralities which are indifferent or amoral to a new class of moral innovators. Rightly said, Primary morality and Primary anti-morality are concrete egoistic mechanisms which are based on that which thrives, and repelled by the failure to thrive. Secondary morality and Secondary anti-morality are abstract altruistic mechanisms which are based on that which fails to thrive, and repelled by that which thrives. 2. Against Altruism: a. The default (a priori) state of the human is Role Forward. Altruism is limited to subsidiary instances where one is performing role reversal. One cannot live one's entire life in a reversed role. b. Role reversal, being a synthetic state, requires group adherence to the rule (e.g the Golden Rule). Role forward is not a synthetic, and requires no group adhrence. Ergo egoism is easier to maintain, and less susceptible to contingency. c. Altruists by default require coercion to ensure obedience of egoists. Egoists require no coercion of altruists. Egoists not concerned with obedience of other egoists or altruists. Workload and goal risk is therefore smaller for egoists and larger for altruists. 3. Religion as Altruism: a. All religions prescribe a set of behaviors toward the express goal of 1) acheiving human perfection and 2) achieving immortality. All religion is human programming, and neither goal is ever acheived. Religion's primary contribution to information is has been its refinement of the myth of human origins, geneology, racial history, geometric and form constants, and the doctrines of population control known as altruistic commandments. b. All religions are interchangeable as dogma, and reducible to numeric code and logic statements. The Pythagorean Mathematikoi were the first religious cult to reduce religion completely to numeric statements. c. The basic phenomena identified by religion are reaction, recurrence and death. The altruistic dictates of all religions are reciprocity, sacrifice, and humility. The promises of all religion are happiness, immortality, eternal pleasure. The threats of all religion are anguish, death, and eternal pain. d. All prescribed behaviors of a religion nature intend to create altruistic persons. The prime movers of all religions gain money, sex, fame, or political ends by tending the temple, else they are self-gratified by becoming the superlative masochist. In rare cases the prime mover is a wise and respectable misanthrope who enjoys solitude and a coarse lifestyle. Such exceedingly rare men ultimately justify the existence of the whole industry. 4. Socialism as religion and altruism. Socialism is strictly speaking and in all cases the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx, and all of its premises which are: the impending end of the Capitalist world (a concept derived from the Biblical Revelations), the Hegelian historical dialectical materialist imperative, historical dialectic as a substitute for religious or pharaonic authority, and most importantly: 1) the belief in the necessity and desirability of democracy to tend toward the Aristotelian word case sencario: tyranny of the demos. 2) the glorification of violence to acheive that state Vladimir Lenin reiterated specifically these last two points to impress their merit upon abstract ideological nonviolent socialists. Lenin believed to shoot first and ask questions later, meaning that socialism, or ultimately communism, was eternally yet to be determined -- a simulacrum. Socialism is religion because it holds oxymoronic judeo-christian pretexts, oddly enough, that while history is materialistic, materialism is evil. Thereby, historical materialism is real, but human materialism is not. The result is an ideology which is arbitrary and imaginary, specifically the real component (and excuse) is history, and the abstract component is the utopian future to be established by the socialists' reign of blood and seizure. Marx was the son of a Rabbi and out to destroy religion to balance the extinction of Judaism in Europe, to destroy money to balance the extinction of the rich Jew, and to destroy democracy to balance the extinction of the minority Jewish vote. Each target of Marxism, including Judaism, was a tool of civilization viewed as an archetype which needed to be destroyed*, ergo a Secondary bourgeois anti-morality adapted from the zionist socialism of Moses Hess. Socialism is altruism because its targets are individuals, and the religion, property, office, and will to power of individuals. Persons who interpret the Hegelian dialectical imperative of history differently or as garbage, are bludgeoned, shot, or denied work by a mass demonstration. All forms of riches of the egoist are confiscated under socialism through the banning or neutralization of all earned benefit. The emphasis is not that there is an inherent evil in the use of force, but merely that socialists use force to the end of hobbling and humiliating persons into the altruist base. Ergo the theme: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need," a Bible quote and a rationale of theft from the master, gifts to the slave, unless the master be the Party Chairman, and the slave be a man who formerly enjoyed the fruits of egoism. 5. Political Correctness as altruism, socialism, and religion. Political Correctness is a soviet propaganda technique invented by a prominent Soviet cultural engineer and public school sociologist. Its raw form as invented in the Soviet Union has prescriptions of everything from required family size, to family structure, to parent-to-child instructional curriculum, to school curriculum, to public restrictions of discourse which will all contribute to the Soviet State planner's idealized mode of public servility and altruistic behavior befitting a communist command state. Specifically, the Soviet State preferred to have many peasant-cum-manufacturer slave laborers with large families (to ensure the worker base and the general poverty of the population), the elimination of only children (who as beneficiaries of parental nurturing grow into autarchic egoists), the destruction of the patriarchal family (which produces independent, noble, and physically unbullied male providers and discriminating and high standard family-faithful economist females), and the general micromanagement of human language and school curriculum to induce servility, mass monism (solidarity), and obedience to the Committee running the state. Political correctness is altruism because it is designed and maintained to produce servile and self-sacrificial mass men to perform repetitive, and arbitrary acts of self-destruction for a state committee. It is simply that the beneficiaries of the acts are no longer big business monopolists, but rather social theorists and former political and economic minorities. Political correctness is religion because it advocates utopianism to gain self-sacrifice on behalf of its slaves, and still the owner of the "Community Center" gets first pick of the money, power, sex, and political pie. Priests are replaced with clerical workers, experts, and regional snoops. No one gains eternal happiness or immortality in exchange for their obedience. Political correctness is proselytic and primarily a mechanism by which ethnic and religious minorities insinuate themselves into public insttutions and discourse. Lack of political correctness in any egoist is the equivalent to sinning or impiety and bears the same penalties (loss of office, book banning, loss of property, shunning), though as yet not the same penalties exacted in medieval times (crucifixion, stoning, burning at the stake). 6. Penumbral rights hallucination as altruism, political correctness and socialism Persons unfamiliar with western government and institutions are lost in the meanings and documents of modern government, and hence interpret them with either the slave interpretations of their backward nation of origin, or with overly abstract and hyperuniversal claims. The slave interpretations of western government include various permutations of the belief in a western Superman, or master over all Americans, an exaggeration of the ethics of the French Revolution, the messianic salvation theologies of the Middle East, and (lost tribal) Israelism. The problem with belief in a western Superman is that such a figure being Stalinesque, can only ascribe to a status of master of Americans, or of an American province. The fact of the matter is that each American is a master under the American system of government, a system which routinely outclasses and devours the foreign and local bred Stalinesque types, even manufacturing and exporting them as products, capturing and pulverizing them periodically, while in general Americans remain an individualistic, fierce, and self-directed type of human being, unburdened by a sense of duty, obligation, or fealty to a political strongman. The problem with the committee variant of the western (domestic) Superman view, is that any committee of judges or board directorates, by nature of their appointed status and ignorance of any common point of reference with the citizenry, are bound to be viewed as a high priesthood of idiots, regardless of their decision process, be it black box, legal precedent, or quadratic equations. The default state of the citizenry is local rule in a common frame of reference, with the most successful egoists excelling beyond the local mass. When the Superman Committee begins handing down oddball altuistic decisions from a nonlocal or supranational dimension, disobedience and violence are not far away. Under the previous two beliefs mentioned, peace and stability, but not longevity exist so long as all groups are appeased, or at least all the loud, obnoxious, and active saboteurs are appeased. This seems to be a form of egoism, yet egoism is restricted to individuals. There is no such thing as a group ego. Organizations do not have a self, though they may have a platform or amalgamated manifesto of claims. Groups and organizations always squelch the individual ego and require altruism. Temporary alliances are just that, transient phenomena. The problem with the exaggerated French Revolutionary thesis is that all communal outbursts are necessarily short lived, bloody, and result in a political strongman wresting power from the mass. The inherent incongruity and incohesiveness of communal masses necessarily gives way to rule by an individual. This is not a total problem for egoists per se, but rather a total problem for altruists, who can never, by definition form a long lived and stable form of government. The problem for egoists is the destruction caused to their life, liberty, and property situations by altruists whose flailings ultimately give rise to a state resembling the previous order. To this end, egoists prefer to stop revolutions or swindle away the result of a revolution, but never themselves to begin one at home. Considering Lenin's swindle of the reigns of power from the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks resulted in Stalin's rise, Internationalist rhapsodies based on the French Commune are inherently moronic. His egoism was short term and muddled with messianic social pretense. Hence the project collapsed into bloody acts of attrition and economic failure when the cultists died off or were murdered. The problem with lost tribal Israelism is similar to that of exaggerated French Revolutionism. All racial and religious herding results invariably in stasis, genocide or exile. This is not a problem for egoists, who can do with or without vast swaths of the human population. It is a problem for the members of the self-chosen tribe and its members, should they, as they generally do, fail in their aims. Such failure takes place as losing a war of settlement, being obliterated economically or with nuclear weapons. Also, if said tribe fails to exodize, but burns their bridge while remaining in a diaspora, the results are generally horrific. A few examples include European Jews, The Branch Davidians, and Ruwandan Tutsis. The tribe in question is having it good for a while, then suddenly over a weekend or a period of weeks or months, the tribe is incinerated or cut to pieces. They are usually destroyed by a better armed, more cohesive, and egoistic people. All rights are claims to action or property, made by people who feel deprived of such items. The drive toward ever widening spectra of rights is due to the combination of several ideas: Judeo-Christianity, The Enlightenment, Social Darwinism and Marxism. These endow the claim of rights with its holy stench, its sense of purpose and mission. a. Judaism provided the messianic principle, and the Sadducean concept of legal precedent. b. Christianity provided the irrationality of martyrdom and the appeal to an infinitely high authority. c. The Enlightenment provided the revival of Aristotelian reasoning which Descartes and Pascal contaminated while inventing otherwise viable new mathematical systems. d. Social Darwinism provided the belief in survival of the economic egoist, a song which was later attempted in performance by tone deaf altruistic groups seeking to engineer a viable social convention that includes the altruist. e. Marxism repackaged dialectical materialism as an evolutionary theory of economy. f. We may add Immanuel Kant, who in critiquing the abstract also invented the Moral Imperative, which is simply Jesuitism masquerading as logic. The net result is as such: A la St. Anselm, I imagine the right to imagine unimaginable rights. I may then compare them with other such idiotic claims which have been made in the past. If they were accepted anywhere, then they are valid. If they are accepted as valid, I must crossbreed them or otherwise confound them with truly accepted or valid principles, or place them somehow on the Saturnalia so everyone begins to observe them. If the public has a debate on the matter, I will appeal to reason, and Pure Reason in that order. If my reasoning is not accepted, I shall abnegate Pure Reason and rely upon the Moral Imperative citing historicity, and the Teleology (ultimate purpose) of history. Should any physical forces, tools, or circumstances preclude my view, I shall wage war against the wind. Iterated function of denial. Finally, when I catch my breath, I shall extol the virtues of granting stones the right to be fish, and fish the right to be umbrellas, demanding a la Godel that if my extensional system of absurd theories is false then so is the extensible system (yours) that I base it upon. In a case such as American government, which is democratic, and laissez faire, the freedom generated by egoists gives altruists much rope with which to hang themselves. But they do not want to hang only themselves. Through Gender Marxism, linguistic balkanization, and various new configurations of impossible and unrealizable variations on the 14th Amendment, the solution the Reconstruction Era has become a Deconstruction Era for the present, and given rise to a warping of the Constitution. The Deconstruction Era: America as mixed economy. America as black box government. Rule by appointees. Rental of the commons. Converso communists as right wing hawks. Butter Side Down vs Butter Side Up: Christian Zionists vs Socialists. Corporate Welfare vs Social Welfare. The American Homeland. Natan Sharansky as America's conscience. Social progress as the abolition of the nuclear family. Social progress as feminization of males. Homosexism. Economic progress as depression of the dollar. Self-deprecation in speech. Stigma attached to the dominant 96% culture. Ignorance and forgetfulness as educational paradigms. General phobia of self and lack of will to hold ones own water. Failure to criticize. Victim love. Confusion of criminal and victim. Embrace of criminality. Failure to amputate. 7. egoism, suprematism, dominance and will to power defined a. egoism: "I" as a means to goal acquisition. b. suprematism: "that which is above all others" as a means to goal acquisition c. dominance: the state of ruling a domain d. will to power: "I" seeking "supreme" "dominance" Egoist suprematism does not include Anselm's conceivable inconceivables or other nonsensical strings. Anselm's mathematics tended toward altruism. It may include Godel's Incompleteness Theorem, insofar as the Theorem trashes PM completeness. Godel beat Russell in mathematical reasoning. Russell beat Godel in pragmatics. Not all of the extensible theorems are constructible. Cantorian mathematics hover at the brink of supreme. Mathematicians can embody either altruism or egoism in their reasonings. Some want to contain everything in a box, some want to prove the box cannot contain all. Similarly, not all logically positivist or objectivist statements are suprematist or egoist. Some tend toward altruism, using a nihilism against value judgements. Relativism yo-yos between all-accepting and all-rejecting, usually with egoism or altruism as a basis. There can be, for example, Secondary anti-moralities based upon logical positivism. Primary morality and anti-morality can be associated with Aristotle's materialism, and Secondary morality and anti-morality can be associated with Plato's idealism. (Men and boys: Men: Nietzsche. Boys: Hannah Arendt, Ayn Rand, Leonard Peikoff, Enzo Traverso.) 8. anti-morality as a nonrevolutionary philosophy The main idea of this writing: The maturity of an anti-morality which is not revolutionary. That is to say a Primary anti-morality. This is the anti-morality of men. The anti-morality of boys is Secondary i.e. revolutionary. This is not reciprocal. One anti-morality ranks above the other. It is not new. It has been seen before. It is often called conservatism, but conservatism is a contaminated term. There are conservatives within religion, political conservatives, but neither of these describes the Primary anti-morality well. The Primary anti-morality has a halting effect upon all but the Primary morality. It stops Secondary morality, e.g. Bohemianism, Baha'i, and Political Correctness. It stops Secondary anti-morality, e.g. Marxism, anti-racism, evangelical homosexuality. Primary anti-morality consists of stopping lesser ideas from taking hold or appending themselves to a root. Primary anti-morality never sees itself as rebelling against a dominant paradigm of strength or even decay. It is the dominant paradigm focused outward. It is the noise gate of the Primary morality. It is the "andnot" or "ifnull" of the Primary morality. In cases where human slime proliferate, Primary anti-morality sees itself in a boat, above the slime, not as a martyr to human slime, or the world's napkin. Primary anti-morality merely does not become dirty with the slime. It may be an anti-sliming agent, which kills slime on contact, but it's job is not to go out and kill slime. The Primary anti-morality is like the disinfectant properties of a rare root. The Primary morality of the egoist is like any other inanimate object, or natural force upon which unwary humans are broken. There is no evangelical imperative. It grows where it grows. The primary philosophers after classical philosophy are: a. Friedrich Nietzsche: inventor of the overman b. Niccolo Macchiavelli: inventor of the overstate Neither man was a revolutionary in the sense of a Secondary anti-morality. 9. egoism, suprematism and will to power as the dominant anti-morality This goes without saying. But for academics sake, we must compare the two anti-moralities. Egoism's anti-morality (Primary), and Altruism's anti-morality (Secondary). Outclassed! But put a number "1" before that which is secondary, and put a "2" before that which is Primary. Idiotic! What does an Altruistic anti-morality rebel against? Number two? No. Altruism's anti-morality hates strength. Wants to "take power away" from Number One. It cannot. So it usually steals from Number Three, which is even lower. A mini-master, or a mini-master's collective with a micro-mini peon. What does Egoism's primary anti-morality reject? Number Two? No. It is no rebel. It merely avoids Number Two. It will not give up power for weakness. It is not suicidal or retarded. Egoism's anti-morality doesn't sell it's house to go live in a box. It scoffs at the pity waged against it by Altruism. Nothing can be pitied until it is first reduced. Thus ends the thesis of Egoism over Altruism. Footnote: * "Marx’s tract was a reply to another book dealing with the emancipation of Jews from feudalist laws which restricted their civil and economic freedom. Marx argued that to talk about emancipating Jews was absurd since everyone was a slave to capitalism which was fundamentally the culture of Judaism. The only true emancipation possible was the destruction of profit-seeking Judaism and it’s step-child, liberal capitalism. As he wrote: “The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.” -- The Marxist Origins of Hitlerian Hate Part 1: Marxist Nazism by Jim Peron http://freedom.orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/marx_hitler.htm |
|
|
|