| ARTICLES |
Lower Learning:  The Harvard Social Forum                            by
                                                                                                         
45 Mt. Auburn St. is near Daedalus on the Harvard Campus.  Its interior looks like the skanky skinhead house in Higher Learning.  But what it houses is in truth an even more digusting embarassment to Harvard University.  It houses the decay of Harvard social life called the Harvard Social Forum.

SASSI vs Finals Clubs

The Harvard Social Forum devolved from an attempt by Maureen Connolly to destroy the "Finals Clubs" who had refused her admittance to their drinking parties even after months of dressing like a slut and ringing doorbells.  In 2004, Connolly got together with Julia Lewandosky and founded "SASSI-WOOFCLUBS" or "Students Against Super Sexist Institutions-We Oppose Oppressive Finals Clubs."  Not merely an exclusive man-hating club for ugly girls, but a club for the destruction of all the other clubs.

The Finals Clubs operate outside of the official student groups ever since the Harvard stopped recognizing them (consequently forfeiting oversight of them).  SASSI attempted to move a step further and have them obliterated.  Though this resembles a bunch of scrubby female Don Quixotes tilting at windmills, it has attracted media attention and spawned other more playful and ridiculous demons, while attracting off-campus trash.  They have managed to subject members of the hated clubs to sensitivity-training and brainwashing sessions.  They have stomped and snorted and claimed gender discrimination.   They have become like an NGO inside of the campus, exerting pressure on boards of directors.

Lisa Schkolnick in 1988 was the first woman to try to sick a quasi-governmental agency on campus clubs to force her membership.  In 1993, more women tried to organize a petition to boycott, and thereby starve out the members.  In 1995 the Harvard dean began accusing clubs of liquor violations and sexual assaults, and finally threatened retaliation by insurance companies.  Due to this pressure, the Inter-Club Council was destroyed.

Concurrently with the attempted destruction of mens' clubs by womens' lobbying groups, was the creation of womens' clubs.  These properties have an estimated value of about $2.5 million dollars each.  They have a supply of law students with nothing to do but find ways to attack the financial pipeline of the so-called racist, sexist, classist white males who won't share their beer.

Harvard Social Forum

Harvard Social Forum is a party house for intellectual refuse and anarchist skanks.  An amusing irony is that the property is owned by the Foundation for Civic Leadership, yet the users of the building (many of whom do not know who owns the building) are anti-civilization and advocate leaderless societies.  One of the many aims of HSF is to convert Finals Clubs into university-owned student communes organized on a collectivist/solidarist model.  In other words, the University gets to oversee and swindle the traditional organizations' property, as long as students are given free reign to run dubious organizations and have fund-raising parties in their burned-out shells. 

Perhaps that would not be a bad idea if it were a self contained process.  But no process on a campus is self contained.  For one thing, the request by FCL that HSF welcome "all sorts" of interest groups has made the building a free-for-all, and not in the utopian sense. It is rather a Bat Cave for launching riots, civil disorder, and cultural warfare while dragging off-campus organizations into free schoolspace, supplying them with resources and venue while also maintaning plausible deniability of cahoots.

HSF coordinator Rachel Bolden-Kramer says her building is "a nest of cooperation where the branches of Harvard's social justice effort can consolidate and pool their resources."  That is a gross understatement.  It is in fact a nest for clandestine meetings between anarcho-socialist, homosexist, communist deviants who mooch off of university resources, raise bail money for hardened criminals, and fuel the largely internet-based Fourth International.

The building was taken by student coup on various occasions including when a woman brought an inconclusive rape case against the Pi Eta organization in 1986, and when another settled out of court in 1988.  They were closed down by Joe Malone in 1991 for having skanky mattress parties.

Now instead of a skanky mattress, there are bloody shirt parties to plan riots in the name of "social justice" and "solidarity among campus organizations," (predominantly the socialist and lesbian ones).  They have a mission statement which functions as a prior restraint: "opposing oppression including white supremacy, male supremacy, economic inequality, and heterosexism."  If you are not vocally opposed to whites, men, money, and heterosexuals, do not enter.  If you do enter, be prepared to pay the higher end of the sliding admission scale to the allegedly "alcohol-free" party, and be prepared to be thrown out when recognized by one of the off-campus goon squads.

The current users of the Harvard Social Forum space are:

Boston Anarchists (front for I.W.W.)
BAAM (Boston's General Anarchist Union)
Anarchist Black Cross  (prison bail organization)
ISO (International Socialist Organization)
Papercut Zine Library  (content restricted to marxist, anarchist, eco, and gay)
Boston Indymedia Center (anarcho-socialist anti-WTO lobby group)
NEFAC (Northeast Federation of Anarchist Communists)

To which miscreants and wannabe labor unionists, I invoke the ghost of Professor G.R. Richardson, who waged in 1975 relentless and systematic warfare against incompetent appliance repairmen from his address of 45 Mt. Auburn St. Cambridge, MA.  His story speaks for those men disgruntled about unrepaired mechanisms everywhere.  He supersedes you.  You are in fact the "bad labor" and not the "fixers of civilization."  To paraphrase his letter to the immortal typewriter repairman Z. Groh:

Dear Mr. HSF:

     Shortly before my summer vacation (I [walk by] Harvard), I brought you my typewriter, [...] When I picked up the typewriter, you assured me that this had been fixed.  [...] And now I discover that it is not fixed at all [...]

     I am not only a [pedestrian through] Harvard, but I am, sadly, a writer; that is, I write every day-- ten, twenty pages a day sometimes.  [...]

     I want you to know how tenaciously I represent the consumer's cause in the struggle against the shoddy indifference that is everywhere.  I want you to understand the hardiness of the enemy you have inspired.  I am your enemy, Mr. Groh-- I am the enemy of every vile business, large or small, that preys on the average customer's sloth and meek acceptance of outrageous service, of parts being constantly out of stock, of inept repair work and absurd costs per hour for what is incredibly referred to as "labor".

     I will be sure to bring you this typewriter in the fall when I return to Cambridge, my fingers begrimed with ink, my appreciation for the rareness of Gojmeracs in America wandering-- if, in the meantime, I can resist driving the long hours in the dead of night and delivering it to you through your display window.

* Apologies to G.R. Richardson,  Leon Neyfakh, and April Yee.