I own and
enjoy your cd titled "Play." I listen to it periodically.
However, I
find you to be an
invertedly arrogant sissy with obtuse and obnoxious homosexual vegan
beliefs. I would like to challenge two of your writings.
The first is
your cd insert for "Play" and the second is your writing about misogyny
which was a rant levelled at Eminem, another dubious personality who
happens to create good records.
Regarding PLAY:
i) You are
out of shape. Do some exercises.
1) You said, "If
we base our belief systems on the humble assumption that the
complexities of the world are ontologically beyond our understanding,
then maybe our belief systems will make more sense and end up causing
less suffering."You
assume we are or should be agnostic and that we have a moral imperative
to prevent suffering at large. I disagree. I believe
agnosticism is
bisexuality of the religion, and that a man need only occasionally
reduce his own suffering. This means out the window with Plato,
Kant,
and Buddha.
2) You called out for a reduction of prisoner abuse and defended
victimless crime in a libertarian way. I can support that.
There is a
limit to your Platonism, that being "live and let live" and "mind your
business."
3) You then list various reasons for being a vegan, none of which are
particularly valid, but your rationale was very cleverly presented as a
nonpersuasive advertisement for veganism. Some people are
persuaded by
and therefore seek out nonpersuasive arguments. It's a fad, I
think,
like Beck being a scrub Scientologist. I did want to say however
that "a
vegan diet is materially more efficient" doesn't
matter because nobody wants to eat a silo full of wheatberries when
they can have one nice juicy hamburger. Prion resistance in
humans
indicates that they also periodically eat each other, rendering a
Jainist "do no harm" outlook on life rather amusing. I also
wanted to
point out that you harm people by using plastic. As do I.
Plastic
contains polyvinyl chlorate which gives children autism and destroys
cells. Musicians are cd-selling murderers. You are doubly a
murderer
for wearing nylon sneakers and shirts with plastic buttons.
4) You said, "whenever we're
aware of a despotic regime victimizing a segment of its population, we
are all to some extent responsible."This
is in reference to the recent fad of counting Americans among the enemy
tribes of Judah for not opening wide the gates of Immigrantland to the
last waves of German Jewish exiles in WWII. You then build off
this
shaky edifice that therefore fags and bohemians must be widely
accepted, and you go on to ban various human emotions, and set your own
criteria for permissible intolerance. Kurt Godel proved that all
systems are
incomplete, and therefore extensible. So, naturally various
fantasies
can be compounded off any basis including Jewish contempt for
Americans, and the vague language of the 14th Amendment. What is
not
necessary is that this extended system of fantasy be demonstrable
within the lower or more physical dimensions of this universe.
This I
am sure you find a great convenience, especially when setting up your
synthetic intellectual and moral speedbumps. Let's be aware that "some extent"
does not necessarily indicate a whole number, a rational number, a
cardinal number, or even a real number. The null set, being a
subset
within all sets, most likely describes the extent to which I am
responsible for Nazi Germany. Your quote of course was the
rationale for
the invasion of Iraq, which caused human suffering. Oops.
5) Finally you say, "how
absolutely horrified and sickened I am by supposed Christians who [sic]
commit acts of violence in the name of Christianity." Then
you do a clever deconstructionism of Christianity using violence as a
negator. Very good. Very run of the mill. True even,
but you miss
the point that what is truly horrifying and sickening about
Christianity are its virtues and teachings, not the way they are
twisted by the hillbillies and rednecks that you hate in such a
benignly concealed way. You uphold those virtues. You
represent the
new Christianity. Find a Unitarian Chapel.
In this writing you pat yourself on
the back for criticizing Prodigy for "Smack My Bitch Up" and for
criticizing the "pernicious and
pervasive spread
of misogyny in popular culture" as
if a) celebrity musicians speaking on issues was ever relevant beyond
the realm of commercial endorsements and b) lesbian hustlers did not
already make a living speaking up on this alleged issue in various
colleges. If misogyny did not exist, it would have to be
invented. What a cash cow!
This is not to say that I believe you are raising the issue for
financial reasons. I believe you are raising the issue because it
satisfies a feminine urge which you were somehow born with or
acquired. I believe invisible boobies glow on your chest when you
say
such things, and Moby wants his invisible boobies to glow and spray
warm milk. I don't
think that is too far out an assumption.
You were "deeply
offended" by the "irresponsible"
release of "music that
glamourized misogyny." This I can relate to in
limited form. I am frequently deeply disgusted by the mendaciously ignorant release of music that glamorizes crack dealers and murderers.
But even more by music that glamorizes defeatism, resentment,
ignorance, herd mentality, or paranoid delusional feelings of
persecution. And yet, Flipside saying your message sucks in no
way
resembles Moby saying "you have blood
on your hands" and
generally posing as a bald Jesus Christ or Kevin Spacey lecturing
Pontius Pilate or Brad Pitt. That is
because I understand that the musician is not responsible for the
listener who may or may not have an identity of his own and who may try
to emulate my identity by repeating my lyrics over and over again like
Sirhan Sirhan. I do not have that responsibility because I did
not rob
that moron of his identity in the first place, and also because he is
an infinitessimal value, a fluke, a worst case scenario. Further,
I reserve the diabolical right to install my identity into my listeners
anyway. You have your
label and your
microphones. Do your best.
You then go on to recapitulate your testimonial with an accusation of
complicity of "the media" for "hav[ing] celebrated
and glamorized music and musicians who write lyrics that glorify
misogyny and homophobia."
So was this rant just a big ad for fags after all? You sure
expended a
lot of effort to slip that one in at the end. The gay rider, the
vegan
rider, the rider for mandatory spanish, the rider for
anti-capitalism.... and then, "i asked a
rhetorical question a few years ago, which was: 'if a
musician made a record wherein he talked about killing blacks and jews
would he get covered in the press and played on radio and mtv? if the
answer is 'no'(as it should be), then why is radio and mtv filled with
music that has lyrics about killing and brutalizing women and gays? is
it somehow less offensive when women and gays are brutalized and
killed?'"
Allow
me to answer that. First, anything sensational gets covered in
the press. Second, the Gay Lobby is not yet as powerful as that of "blacks and
jews," but with your celebrity endorsement, no doubt you
can join the long line of people who want to make MTV pee it's
pants.
The owner of MTV's parent company is a Zionist. Perhaps one day
he
will become gay, and then on that great day homos will win the
reversals in music video that they once won in the Journal of the
American Medical Association.
To be a little less sarcastic for the speds who live on alfalfa sprouts
and handjobs, what I mean to say is that comparing women and their
homosexual shopping pals to blacks and jews just follows with vegans
complaining about music that glorifies the "animal holocaust."
You are
responsible for that deluge of nonsense. What punishment do you
deserve? Sit in the naughty corner and think about your actions.
