A Proud Lie
Indymedia's Relationship with Total Assholes
by Flipside
As I interact with the Boston Indymedia Center, I find out more about
the structure and operations of this alleged home of open publishing
and truthful independent news which allegedly operates as a locally
run, "c'mon down" sort of node of the international network. What
it really is, is a bulletin board for local anarcho-socialist,
communist, and homosocialist warfare against people, companies, and
local landmarks. It is a place for vandals, protesters, and
disruptors of free speech and assembly to post glamor shots of
themselves in a self-congratulatory and highly censorious environment
edited by an anonymous handful of interested parties which run out of a
cell in downtown Boston.
This month I have made interesting breakthroughs on the identities of
several of the criminals who routinely use Boston Indymedia Center
(BIMC) as a base for free speech disruption, the dissemination of
terrorist material, the laundered support of political parties, and the
launching of anonymous personality attacks against the enemies of a
very privileged group of left-extremists operating out of Boston's
local high schools and colleges. This month, I have obtained
comprehensive information on three major slimes who were operating
under the names X, Antifa, and Shadowboxer. They are Pete Lowney,
David Rolde, and Michael Gould-Wartofsky respectively. I have
also discovered the network of backchannels by which BIMC participates
in a form of "documentation" which is really participation, the nature
of which leads to deaths, such as the death of NYIMC member Brad Will
who was killed this month while "documenting" the Zapatista EZLN.
This election month, I grabbed the attention of members of the Green
Party who were using BIMC to attack members of the Massachusetts Police
Force. I have discovered more names of the cell of anarchists
operating out of Lawrence, Massachusetts. Much of this
interaction was summarily destroyed by members of BIMC, but I keep good
records of our transactions. From here I shall describe my
interactions of this month and the amusing and pathetic antics which
followed.
Arise,
write someting witchy:
I caught BIMC in a debacle this month where Sofia Jarrin-Thomas did
center-column an anonymously attributed "Free all of Palestine" article
which was actually corroborated by a Haters Magazine (HM) source to be
penned by "Pete L." whose email address (Proudline@yahoo.com) identifies him as Pete Lowney, a
snowboarder and ice climber. He is also an anti-zionist with
outstanding warrants for disorderly conduct in Lexington, MA and has a
deportation record. He spends most of his time travelling abroad,
going snowboarding, or living the lush life of a career
protestor. That is, when he is not forwarding communiques from
Saddam Hussein and Hezbollah:
Pete Lowney, Sad Clowny
Letter from President Saddam
Hussein to Boston Anarchists Pete L.
reply [to sender ] [to list ]
# From: "Pete L." < proudline@yahoo.com>
# To: bostonanarchists@lists.riseup.net
# Subject: Letter from President Saddam Hussein to Boston Anarchists
# Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
# Domainkey-signature: [redacted]
"...will Satan the deceiver and the hate-filled supporters of Zionism
keep pushing the Americans until the waves swallow them and they sink
to the depths of the raging sea."
"Esteemed ladies and gentlemen of the peoples of America, the time has
come to an end in which greatest and best-equipped armies could scatter
the organized formations of the opposing army and thereby bring a war
to a close. Now you see our courageous army, our heroic people, and our
Mujahideen replacing the system of organized formations with a new kind
of warfare. And when the Americans on the ground become targets in the
vicinity of the guns of the revolutionaries, who attack them as deadly
human bombs with nothing more than their bodies filled with faith in
God, American superiority is worn down over time. In fact in the
near future that superiority will become a burden whose equipment will
be difficult to withdraw. So, will America trust the voice of
rationality and logic that calls for the preservation of what still
remains, or will Satan the deceiver and the hate-filled supporters of
Zionism keep pushing the Americans until the waves swallow them and
they sink to the depths of the raging sea?."
Videos of the Iraqi Resistance
http://www.albasrah.net/pages/mod.php?mod=art&lapage=../ar_articles_2006/0806/aflam_290806.htm
A clear triumph is near. Pete L.
reply [to sender ] [to list ]
# From: "Pete L." < proudline@yahoo.com>
# To: bostonanarchists@lists.riseup.net
# Subject: A clear triumph is near.
# Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
# Domainkey-signature: [redacted]
The address of the General Secretary of Hizballah, His Excellency
Sayyid Hasan Nasrallah, to the Nation, the Lebanese people, the
resistance fighters, the
Zionists, and the Arab leaders.
Translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr
Friday, 14 July 2006.
Peace be upon you and the mercy of God and His blessings!
Thus Pete Lowney, aka Pete L. or Proudline is a lily white 36 year old
from Newton, MA who views himself as a member of Hezbollah, forwarding
the communiques of Iraqi and Lebanese dictators and terrorists as if
they were instructions to the Boston Anarchist community. He
wears a hijab. He
writes really horrible and necrophiliac emotional poetry on his blog
"The Invisible Poison" where he imagines himself to be a maggot and
bemoans the state of the world in the manner of a textbook
disillusioned narcicistically damaged Holden Caulfield type terrorist
recruit.
"The
personal pathway
model suggests that terrorists came from a selected at risk population
who have suffered from early damage to their self esteem. Their
subsequent political activities may be consistent with the liberal
social philosophies of their families." --Who Becomes a Terrorist and
Why
For some time I did not know who this person was, who operates on BIMC
under several hundred aliases including "x, The Angry Goyim, reposted,
Phalanx, Voxfux, messenger, Agent Smiley, and fauxlosopher," usually
posting garbage about 9-11 conspiracies, chemtrails, and psychotronic
warfare. He is obsessed with Israel, and was deported from there
for his membership in ISM which is theWest Bank pro-palestinian group
whose member Rachel Corrie was killed by an Israeli bulldozer while
protesting the occupation.
The sad circumstances of Rachel Corrie's death-by-documentation
notwithstanding, Pete Lowney has an intense sympathy for Al Qaeda, the
jihadist movement, and has a bitter hostility against Jews and
Evangelical Christians. He vents this hostility by running around
the Boston area with David Rolde and they do things like crash Jewish
school events, and drape things over the Christmas displays downtown,
and provoke push-fights with local police. With an anarchist cell
from Lawrence, he was arrested in 2005 for vandalism in a protest of
Raytheon. He has been kicked, punched, eye-gouged, and maced by
police from Lexington to Andover, and he enjoys it. His tale of
vandalism and resisting arrest was documented by Sean Donahue of
Durham, NH who printed it to BIMC.
In 2005, he was later arrested by official-police-as-rent-a-cops in
Lexington for a protest against the Israeli consul Meir Shlomo. "Pete was the only one arrested
and was charged with trespass, disorderly, AB on a PO and resisting
arrest," said his National Lawyers' Guild (NLG) rep Beverly
Chorbajian. A mistrial was later declared when the Lexington
police were caught in flagrante delicto thieving disclosure evidence
from the judge's desk and fleeing the courtroom. Lexington does
in fact play whore-steerer to Israeli officials, and Lexington police
did blow the trial. And yet, Pete Lowney distinguished himself as
the one worth arresting for trespassing, disorderly conduct,
assault and battery and resisting arrest as he had done several times
before. He was transported to Lawrence for his outstanding
warrants.
Subsequently, Pete Lowney's name was entered into a few intelligence
databases and this was during the time he was also using BIMC as his
own private, anonymous anti-hasbara of not only anti-zionist
propaganda, but strange stuff about 9-11, chemtrails, and mind
control. He was entered into the database of The Jewish Advocate
(TJA) which is a zionist hasbara newspaper operating out of the Combat
Zone in downtown Boston. They have correlated his presence at
various protests and traced his activism. Haters Magazine has
visited TJA in the past regarding BU's Richard Landes and his support
of Harvard's Larry Summers and determined that they do not accept
submissions to the editor which contradict the Zionist party
line. They also track people who have run afoul of Hillel House
which runs hasbaras on all university campuses.
When Pete Lowney was entered into the Massachusetts State Police's
"Fusion Center" database he was sincerely fuct. Officer Philip Tarpey SPD/CIB of
Springfield MA asked the Fusion Center to forward the email to the
Lexington Police, thereby informing them that members of Lowney's
anarchist cell were organizing a
court solidarity
appearance (a pack-the-court session). He lifted the email from Ariseaction@yahoogroups.com from a list called Arise Action
which he joined as a member and which is a soft cell with hard members
with multiple affiliations who relay information through backchannels
to the more socialist, anarchist, communist and criminal
organizations. Pete Lowney was forwarding his story to Arise
Action and to the Boston Anarchists to recruit them for court
appearance, and while he was looping this information, Officer Tarpey
was relaying it back to Lexington where it was harming his case.
That his relay was subject to relay was pissing off Pete Lowney, so he
also back chanelled the information to Sofia Jarrin-Thomas of Indymedia
who centered the article. BIMC by this action claimed
constructive authorship of the article and its protected comments
outlining the nature and personality of third parties. It was at
this point that I confronted BIMC about the article I targetted
all interested parties which included BIMC, WMASS IMC, SA, NECDP,
Arise, and by overlap, the Massachusetts Green Party:
28 Sep 2006
This
article is a
special favor by BIMC for DON OGDEN who is both a WMASS IMC
editor/censor and a member of Arise for Social Justice. Owen Broadhurst
is running for office and is in this political organization with
Socialist David Rolde who is a Friend of Boston Indymedia from
Socialist Alternative. Owen Broadhurst promptly responded to this
article which indicates that BIMC has back channel contacts with ARISE.
Pete Proudline has a criminal record and David Rolde is using Arise to
wage warfare against the police on his behalf. BIMC indulges them. This
article was published under a fake name to conceal the identity of
David Rolde from Weston MA, of the New England Committee to Defend
Palestine. BIMC is passing anonymous slander as news.
This promptly got the attention of Owen Broadhurst who replied:
Correcting a Disinformation Campaign by
Owen Broadhurst
For
the record,
neither myself nor Mr. Rolde - to the best of my knowledge - in fact
are members of ARISE for Social Justice. Given this, information
relayed to this site by people who claim the contrary should not in any
way be viewed as being at all credible- but shoudl be viewed as suspect.
Furthermore,
to cite my
very own reply to posts of 14 September containing erroneous and false
information as evidence of a "backdoor" between ARISE for Social
Justice and Boston IMC discredits not only that accusation but also
s/he who did level that accusation. I have contributed to Boston IMC
within the past, very frequently read Boston IMC posts, and subscribe
to the Google news beta service alerting me to various articles of
interest based on select keywords. Of course I noticed.
I am
indeed a candidate
for State Representative in the Third Hampden District, and have stated
that here plainly. I also state my name plainly.
I am
Owen R. Broadhurst Green-Rainbow
Party
candidate for State Representative in the Third Hampden District Green-Rainbow
Party
State Committee delegate from Hampden County
Eager to confront any defender of the garbage taking place, I unloaded:
You must be some other Owen
Broadhurst from an alternate universe then by
FLIPSIDE (No
verified email
address) 28 Sep 2006
" For the record, neither myself nor Mr. Rolde - to the best of my
knowledge - in fact are members of ARISE for Social Justice."
Uh,
yeah you are. The
members list of Arise for Social Justice is:
WMassJwJ vincent
scallice David
Rolde Shel
Horowitz Emily
Lewis Cort
Greene (Marxist) Tribal
Scribal EDITOR,
WMASS IMC email (shaysite2003) valeoftheoaks@... Don Ogden connex: AK,
John, Josh, Anna Marsha
MCClelland Owen
Broadhurst james
m nordlund Michael
Lindberg John
Smithee (Communist) Carolyn
Toll Oppenheim Nick
Camerota (WMIAC) David
Ecklein American
Friends Service
Committee susan
dorazio (Socialist
Party Springfield, MA) wmgac (at) egroups.com Jean
Grossholtz (Earth
First) Michaelann
Bewsee
(whatever) Felice
Yeskel (Umass
Communist Professor) Isolda
Ortega (SEIU)
You
guys are:
Arise
for Social Justice
Nature:
Unitarian
Communist Homosexual Deval Patrick supporters. Base:
Springfield /
Northampton / Hadley / Greenfield, MA. Site:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AriseAction/
You
are a group which
overlaps Indymedia Center, Green Party, Socialist Alternative, and the
eco-terrorist group Earth First.
Which Owen Broadhurst copped to in his roundabout way:
Correction of Disinformation
Campaign Continues
by Owen Broadhurst
owen.broadhurst (nospam) gmail.com (verified) 28 Sep
2006
Hello, folks -
As surely most individuals who have read the noted article and posts
following have noted, the list in question has traditionally been a
very open list that is in no way reserved specfically for members of
ARISE for Social Justice. I personally happen to be no more an ARISE
for Social Justice than former fellow list subscriber Officer Tarpey
has been. I should note that I may very well someday join the ranks of
ARISE for Social Justice and very much admire that organization - but
am in no way, shape or form a member today.
Sincerely yours,
Owen R. Broadhurst
So I took the opportunity to present my opinion of his candidacy for
Green Party State's Representative:
FLIPSIDE
(No verified email address) 28 Sep 2006
It is also of the utmost importance to the votership that they be
informed that you are quite an associate of David Rolde, who is a very
dubious political personality. You author Green Party proposals
together.
David Rolde is widely known as the fat guy in a burqa that posts raving
anti-semitic lunacy to the Boston Anarchists Listserv and caused a huge
tiff with the other Jewish members which resulted in Sholom Keller
leaving town.
Rolde aka Green Party Secretary also said:
"...The violence is entirely the fault of the Zionist entity. We cannot
place any blame on people for defending themselves from brutal racist
colonial expansionist occupation...".
David Rolde Tried to get Weston School Committee to eliminate the
Pledge of Allegiance.
Just what the hello kind of American are you? What kind of human? What
kind of eco-fascist anti-semite to have David Rolde as your henchman?
I quote you, Owen Broadhurst:
"we recognize the following presidential and vice presidential
candidates (in addition to the Green Party ticket of David Cobb and Pat
LaMarche) as comrades in the struggle against the corporate imperialist
parties, and we applaud them for declaiming our common views in the
presidential forum:
The Socialist Equality Party ticket of Bill Van Auken & Jim
Lawrence,
The Workers World Party ticket of John Parker & Teresa Gutierrez
The Independent ticket of Ralph Nader & Peter Camejo
The Peace & Freedom Party ticket of Leonard Peltier & Barry
Bachrach
The Socialist Party USA ticket of Walt Brown & Mary Alice Herbert"
BIMC which ostensibly only hides false information promptly began
deleting the entire discussion, eliminating the evidence that they had
been caught back channelling information from the WMASS - Arise - Green
cell on behalf of David Rolde and Pete Lowney, and in which Owen
Broadhurst had been drawn because David Rolde and Pete Lowney are
intimately connected with all of the organizations. The BIMC
agent deleting the articles was Jonathan McIntosh. I discovered
his identity because when I relentlessly reposted the deleted
information, he complained to Sofia Jarrin-Thomas:
Fri Sep 15 11:43:58 PDT 2006
* Previous message: [IMC-Boston-Tech] other press...
* Next message: [IMC-Boston-Tech] BIMC Spammed
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject
] [ author ]
Hi Jon,
This is Jonathan (a newer member of boston indymedia) sofia jarrin
asked me to email you because her net is down. I believe she left you a
phone
message.
Anyway it looks like the BIMC site has been spammed by this flipside
person. I have deleted about 30 or 40 of the posts today but can not
keep up, he
most have a bot working.
All the newswire has been filled with the same post from him. Is there
anything we can do about this?
Thanks
-Jonathan
[IMC-Boston-Tech] Spammed again
jonathan jonathan at capedmaskedandarmed.com
Fri Sep 29 09:53:07 PDT 2006
* Previous message: [IMC-Boston-Tech] other press
& stats
* Next message: [IMC-Boston-Tech] Spammed again
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject
] [ author ]
Can we please do something about flipside spamming the site! Log his
IP, ban
his username, something!?! This is insane, if we allow a spammer to take
over our site, BIMC is useless!
-J
To which the answer was no. Being one who despises craven acts of
cowardice and censorship I played indian brave and let my censor know
that he was identified:
Attn: Jonathan McIntosh by Flipside
You DO realize that I know who you are, and that I know your Caped
Masked and Armed Website, and your picture, and that I am on BIMC right
now, speaking to Owen Broadhurst, the candidate for Green Party State
Representative on your center column, and YOU are trying to delete
evidence of my discussion with a party candidate?
This
transaction with
the Green Party Candidate is wholly saved to a disc on my computer, and
will become the subject of a published and circulated news article. Do
you really want to be included in this article as the BIMC member who
tried to erase a dialogue with a major alternative political party as
it was taking place? Do you feel that having taken a photography trip
to Jakarta makes you intellectually qualified to determine the facts of
current events by deleting them? It is going to look VERY bad for you
when I report your thoroughly apish and ignorant gestapo tactics to the
public.
Which prompted more hasty deletions and naturally more relentless
reposts. After approximately five hours of relentless reposts, an
anonymous BIMC editor threatened me with frivolous legal action for
"illegally" disagreeing with them. I played along, pretending to
be outraged and to reason my case, eliciting more information form the
censors, and giving myself opportunity to jab them on their closed
membership.
Editor:
Robert Goodwin, Legal measures will be implemented if you don't refrain
from threatening members of the BIMC community.
It is wrong and illegal to threaten, intimidate, or harass other people
regardless of whether those threats are delivered in person, on the
phone, via the mail, or over the Internet. It can be especially harmful
to deliver such threats in a public area such as a Web site, chat room,
or bulletin board.
FLIPSIDE:
You are lying, Jonathan, and you are claiming anonymity which is
cowardly. I didn't threaten you. You are now trying to be a passive
aggressive. You cannot catch a rape case against me over posting about
the Green Party.
Editor:
Robert, it's not Jonathan and I don't make frivolous threats. I will
follow through on legal measures if you don't stop the harrasment of
members of our community.
FLIPSIDE:
The deal is, stop censoring me in violation of the terms of this
website, make the website NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, or face repeated
reposting to the thread in which you betrayed the trust. There is no
other deal. You WILL stop censoring me, or I WILL keep reposting my
comments.
If you bring a case of harassment against me frivolously, I will
countersue. Just stick by your stated guidelines. Under them, I HAVE A
RIGHT to post here.
If this is Sofia, you have a record of false accusation of harrassment.
I can make this case. I certainly won't take seriously any
comment coming from "editor."
Editor:
This is not a free for all site. We have an editorial policy about what
we can hide and delete from this website, and that includes your
articles, specially because you are known for disrupting the site. For
more information see: [blah blah blah]
FLIPSIDE:
Garbage and dismissed. You hide articles which do not violate the
editorial policy. You also are active in organizations which prevent
you from being a disinterested party. Including, Zapatistas, Boston
Anarchists, and BAAM. You must clearly state that this site is not
oppen to user comments, or you must allow comments which do not violate
your editorial policy. Pretending to be an abused housewife is not
going to alter the fact that people will come here expecting to post.
FLIPSIDE:
I just reread the policy. It says you may hide duplicate posts. There
can be no duplicate post if you have banned the original. Sorry.
Editor:
Send me your article again, and I can point out why it violates our
policy.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noted here that anything can be construed as a policy violation, per
this admission of "Editor."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLIPSIDE:
Your editorial policy does not say that you may hide posts that you
simply disagree with. And since you are a 501 c nonprofit, I can hold
you to your editorial policy. You are not a newspaper.
Editor:
We have consensed on hiding the following types of posts: [policy
repost blah blah]
2. Any post by an individual known by Indymedia to have consistently
acted in a disruptive manner and that the collective has unanimously
identified as a sabateur.
No. 2 on the second paragraph applied to you, Flipside.
FLIPSIDE:
I disagree with you. The editorial policy is not open ended. I can not
permit you to openly and arbitrarily make ad hoc cases for why to
delete legitimate material. I know fully well that you can lie your way
into hiding an article. Your ability to interpret vague policy is not
in question. What is in question is whether I will obey you and stop
posting it. Sofia, YOU have been identified as to have consistently
acted in a disruptive manner, and anonymously, and to sabotage the
website. It is how you got to be in control of the website. I attended
the meetings. You
sabotaged the working relationship of Indymedia group by false
accusations of being threatened by Pete Stidman. I merely post an
occasional comment which gets hidden because BIMC members have an
alternate view of reality.
Editor:
Nice try :) Sofia's not in control of the website... thank goodness for
that!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Editor"s identity is being narrowed down. Possibly Svea Eppler,
battered womens' lawyer/student/lesbo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLIPSIDE:
I am certainly not going to take you seriously since you obviously have
no name.
Editor:
Indymedia DOES have an alternative view of reality. We believe in
challenging corporate media and YES we are slanted towards social
justice. I think you have the wrong idea about our "open newswire"
policy. We do not allow right-wing, racists posts here.
FLIPSIDE:
That isn't going to convince me. I am neither right-winger nor a
racist. I am
just a regular poster that is on the Indymedia blacklist because they
have a longstanding grudge against free speech.
Editor:
This is a violation of our policy: "Just what the hello kind of
American are you? What kind of human? What kind of eco-fascist
anti-semite to have David Rolde as your henchman?" You are insulting a
member of the general community with accusations that can't be really
proven. That is an unethical from a journalistic point of view.
LITERALLY, it's called slander and you could be sued for it. There's NO WAY we can leave that up
on the site, comprende?
FLIPSIDE
No it is not. You are a liar. You routinely center column items with
exactly the same kind of content, just against your own enemies. And,
mind you you center anonymous material. I have said nothing on
Indymedia that you could sue me for. And you could pony up no lawyer
that was not from 45 Mt. Auburn St. or a member of an anarcho-socialist
interested party. You on the other hand, center anonymous articles
penned by people in Boston with felony and misdemeanor criminal records.
FLIPSIDE
I will not submit to censorship. Have I submitted to censorship ever
since the DNC. See, you guys repost garbage anonymously by David
Rolde. I, on the other hand, get the Owen Broadhursts posting to your
website. It has always been this way. I bring the Mark Laskeys and the
Noah Hurowitzes to your website, because I, unlike you, challenge them.
Editor
Saying "Jonathan, I know where you live" is a direct threat... There's
no way around that one. And we've been keeping files like that one on
you ever since you started throwing out threats.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have files on their attempt to keep files on me for various imagined
transgressions in their hopes of building a case that one of their
anarchist law students could bring. In their dreams. On a
cold day in hell when they are not in court as defendants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FLIPSIDE:
You guys can only circulate unattributed poison pen letters by your
friends from JP, Cambridge, and Somerville. Stuff they are afraid to
take credit for. I am not afraid. Not of the police, not of the NLG,
not of you, not of Michael Andrews. Did I say Jonathan I know where you
live? Probably in the context of the giant picture he posted of his
living room with a big bong on the table, which I saved a copy
of. Do you think I won't say that Jonathan and his midget brother
are potsmoking communists?
Look, I have sat in on Women's Battered Shelter sessions before. I am
not afraid of purple triangle fist and hand threats of frivolous
lawsuit. Do you know that you can be severely fined for faking assault
and battery and pretending to be threatened? Or do you forget that you
have to go outside the legal system to interest groups to defend
yourself in fake cases? I mean the public can and does know that people
operate political harassment and protest groups as non profits and try
to squelch discussion by these Scientology tactics.
Editor:
Policy violations in Robert Goodwin Original Posts SEP/29/06.
Repeated false accusation that BIMC has "ties to" or is"friends with"
or "overlaps" with the Socialist Alternative, David Rolde, the Green
Rainbow Party etc. Using phrases like "Unitarian Communist Homosexual
Deval Patrick supporters." Using phrases like "What kind of eco-fascist
anti-semite to have David Rolde as your henchman?"
FLIPSIDE:
You don't get it. You can't make a case that people cannot
reference whether a person supports gay rights. You can't censor an
opinion. You can't. You people are legally and technologically unable
to censor opinion. Every time we have this discussion I re-offer that
you stop trying to censor my opnion and I will stop posting a zillion
times every time you delete it. You keep declining to take the offer.
You can't even CARRY NEWS you do so much censorship.
Editor:
Flipside, you post stuff that violates our editorial policy and it will
get deleted no matter how much you whine about it. It's as simple as
that. Print it and memorize it.
--------------------------------------------------------
Of course I am printing it. 10,000 people are reading it.
--------------------------------------------------------
FLIPSIDE:
I have stated that I would go to meetings to make my case. You offer an
open meeting policy. You offer an open POSTING policy. You don't ADHERE
to your policy, but that is hardly my problem. Understand that faking
battery will not get you anywhere since you guys have a record of doing
that to railroad people, and YOU GUYS have the open policy.
Editor:
You were banned to come to IMC meetings by a unanimous collective
decision about 1 YEAR ago, remember?
http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-boston/2005-August/0829-cz.html
FLIPSIDE:
Actually, I was sent an anonymous letter about that, which I do not
acknowledge, because not only was it not signed, it took place during
personnel warfare and also because I myself was not a party to the
letter, having joined Indymedia a month prior. You don't actually have
a procedure for ousting people from the collective anonymously when
they joined during the open membership period which you duly
advertised. After a month of BIMC membership I received this anonymous
letter saying I couldn't come to meetings. I was no party to that. You
can't have meetings to oust other members.
Either you will allow posting, or you will have to run the site all by
yourself, because none of the noobs are going to hold up to a member
who wants to say something. And what the hell's wrong with your
posting system? It's posting out of sequence.
Editor:
It's "busted" because we're having so many problems with spam still.
Can't continue talking over a 2nd thread... not polite to people who
think our conversation here is utterly boring. Unfortunately, flipside,
the collective CAN ban people that they find disruptive. You had been a
poster for over a year when that decision was made. And when we posted
it, the rest of the wider community supported us in our decision.
-------------------------------------------
Hence my analysis of the wider community.
-------------------------------------------
FLIPSIDE:
I was not notified of the vote. Being a due member of Boston Indymedia
Center under the open membership criteria that existed before the big
IMC breakup I am entitled to be at any and all meetings which discuss
my membership status. And you know, you could reduce the spam on this
site if you stopped Cleaves Publishing, Yo, Ibis, and Budgie sock
puppets from running your otherpress. Or if you took my advice five
months ago and put up spam control. I notified you of your spammers.
Editor:
yes, and we thought you were the spammer (which you still are, once in
a while... like today). we're trying to implement further captchas to
control that. I think the feds are spamming all indy sites.
FLIPSIDE:
You're paranoid. I only look like spam because I am forced to repost my
comments.
I hope the feds are spamming all indy sites. Just a brief
analysis of the BIMC editorial staff shows two anarchists, two
socialists, one Zapatista, and an MIT technician operating a bogus news
service whose editorial policy was mandated by the Northeast Federation
of Anarchist Communists who house the BIMC meetings at the Lucy
Parson's Center / Red Book Store which is operated rent free in a
section of town with expensive property values for a bunch of young
douchebags who are ten times more totalitarian than anyone within a ten
block radius. But more importantly, the feds should spam their
site because they post anonymous articles penned by avowed members of
Hezbollah, EZLN, CISPES, and other various latin or muslim terrorist
groups.
Even more importantly, they should be censored because they do not
believe in free speech. Does that make sense? Probably not,
but my explanation is this: Their form of speech is contingent
upon maintaining a hostile and anonymous environment free from dissent,
because they have crowned themselves the official dissenters, and made
everyone else to be the reactionary, counter-revolutionary fascist
enemy. The way that they should be censored is by persons
aggressively pursuing their individual - and not collective - right to
free speech, disrupting consensus, and shattering the solidarity of
hive minds. They must be challenged openly, relentlessly,
humorously, and fearlessly.
Especially when someone they protect turns around and stabs them in the
back. Such was the case on October 9 when BIMC Jonathan
McIntosh's shielding of David Rolde blew up in his face. At 3 AM,
vandals from the Brookline High School went down to the North End to
"celebrate" Columbus Day (observed) by pouring red paint all over the
marble Columbus statue which had been donated by members of the North
End Italian community. They immediately published this act on
Indymedia, and Jonathan McIntosh went down to photograph it later that
morning so that the story could me moved to their center column.
He made a loud protest at BIMC that -- attention everybody -- they are
reporting after the fact. Meanwhile the Brookline High School
group, overseen by Emily McLaughlin, Boston Anarchist cell members Tom
McManus of Brookline, Noah Hurowitz from Arlington MA and BIMC member
Eric Ginsburg from Wellsley MA mobilized their team of protesters to
wave signs and bang things in front of Brookline Walgreens.
Jonathan McIntosh and Sofia Jarrin-Thomas were to meet there next and
"document" the protest for another center column feature.
David Rolde
Unfortunately, other members of the Boston Anarchist (BA) cell had
other plans. While the Brookline High contingent were a bunch nof
18 year olds, and the BIMC a bunch of 20-somethings, the 36 pushing 40
year olds were about to come on the scene. BA member David Rolde
showed up with his fat ass and burqa and some hamfisted signage about
Israel sucking and heckled the young students, hijacking their cause
for an anti-Israel protest and forcing them to go on the march to get
away from him. When the story was woven for BIMC, there was great
outpouring of outrage. David Rolde, officer of the MA Green Party
wrote in under the pseudonym Antifa to gloat over his hijacking of the
protest. This provoked the finger wagging of a "Jonathan" who
then proceded to call him out as being "infamous [...] unaccountable to
the activist community [...] having no idea the meaning of the word
solidarity" and generally having broken the ruled of engagement of
protesting. This was the same charge levied against Officer Phil
Tarpey by Arise Action, and which confirms my thesis about the highly
contingent nature free speech in a socialist environment. Because
of this I made it a point at some future date to tell Jonathan to his
face that he has no conception of free speech. Granted, was at
first some ambiguity as to which "Jonathan" was speaking, as there is a
Jonathan McIntosh at BIMC who covers events in which he actively
participates and does not use the word "myself" or clarify the last
name as is customary in straight journalism. It was Rolde who
announced that Jonathan and Sofia were the party now manufacturing
consent in the conversation.
Before mass deletions I managed to get a jab into the
conversation. I said, "And Indymedia, good one. Good job sticking
up for this douchebag and trying to hide his identity for 16 hours last
week. Now he fucks up one of your pretend news stories / high school
recruitment sessions and it's whining about backstabbing. You guys kiss
mad ass. Mad mad fucking ass. Kiss his ass more. Reconciliate. Maybe he
won't dress in a burqa at your solidarity circle jerks." My
comments arrived in the middle of back and forth demands for
apology. While they were fluffing, I added, "David Rolde watched
the anarchist listservs and read Tom McManus' announcement that the
protest was to take place, THEN HE CAME AND CRASHED IT. And BIMC was
protecting his articles here the whole time. Then he bit them on the
ass." A livid Noah Hurowitz chimed in, accusing David Rolde of
spewing, and being unbelievable.
Seva Brodsky
Finally, Seva Brodsky a zionist hasbara agent provocateur posted idiot
pictures of David Rolde in full regalia. In more ass covering,
Jonathan tried to make a point that he hates Israel too, but was only
taking issue with Rolde's time and place. Rolde accused them of
this ass covering. I added: "Don't talk about Jonathan and
Sofia's asses. They might sue you for sexual harassment. The word ass
is sexual in nature. Don't give the NLG a chance to pounce on you.
Don't give Michael Andrews a chance to consult his law books. Don't
give in to rape culture." Michael Andrews is a communist lawyer
and member of Boston Anarchist's siamese sister cell BAAM, part of
their frivolous lawsuit supreme team.
Another anonymous BIMC user wrote: "With David Rolde being an offspring
of two psychiatrists with Harvard and McGill pedigrees (specializing in
child psychology, to boot), he is a walking malpractice case for his
parents medical practices in Weston, MA, a wealthy Boston suburb. With
mommy and daddy's mansion and them picking up his bills, his sole
occupation seems to run around Boston to look for any Jewish events.
Note that both, his kefyah (the blankie?) and the Palestinian flag
could use a good wash." The same can be said of his partner from
NECDP Pete Lowney. It is important to note again that the Rolde
and Lowney team splintered the BA cell a few months back and drove Gulf
War Veteran Sholom Keller out of the group with all their pro-Saddam,
pro-Hezbollah sieg heiling.
Thus was BIMC drawn into a debacle involving anonymous people they
shield, including terrorist activists within Green Party .
<<<FLASHBACK>>> Here is a good place to include the
carbon copy letter I received from the I-Don't-Know-What in charge of
Arise Action:
From
: "Michaelann Bewsee" <michaelannb@hotmail.com>
To : davidrolde@comcast.net,
contextflexed@juno.com
Cc : outnow@rcn.com,
Kmilberg@comcast.net, michaellindberg@burntmail.com,
owen.broadhurst@gmail.com
Subject : A message we didn't
post but are very curious about
Date : Mon, Oct 02, 2006 07:01 AM
Hey, Flipside, I am not going to post your message, and I'll tell you
why-- I don't really want AriseAction to become a battleground for
Boston sectarian interests. I am CCing this msg. to David Rolde,
also, so he will see your msg.
FYI, Arise is a low-income rights organization; AriseAction is the
listserve we set up five years ago, which has taken on a character of
its own. It might be hard to tell much about Arise from the
postings on AriseAction! I don't know if you'd like Arise much--
you should check out our very out-of-date website at
ariseforsocialjustice.org.
Re Officer Tarpey-- if you want to check our archives, you will see
that Tarpey does not deny doing what he was accused of doing, and that
it wasn't
the first time but the third that he used info on our website to
undermine activists' work-- my first clue was when we had a picket of
the local welfare office planned and he called the welfare director to
let he know we were coming-- not fatal, but we did lose the element of
surprise.
We have tried to deal with Officer Tarpey directly and respectfully
about the issues that his membership on out list have brought up.
I admit I'm concerned about the thought that Indymedia found out about
what happened from David himself-- is that true, David?-- because it
has left us a mess that we have to clean up and I'm not happy about it,
because I barely have enough time as it is to organize/participate in
our activities. We run a food pantry, vigil weekly against the
war, organize homeless people, try to stop construction of new jails,
have a voting rights lawsuit against the city, etc.
Again, FYI, we have no problem with David's membership in various
groups (I think you included them in your posts as stating something
unpleasant about David) but we do have Jewish members who feel that
David is anti-semitic, not just anti-zionist, and we are working to
figure out how to address this.
The purpose of AriseAction is to promote organizing and
information-sharing among western Mass. residents. Your post has
helped the list moderators to think about doing a real list analysis,
to restore the list closer to its original intentions. We'll see
how this develops.
When I received that letter it verfied that it was not others unknown
from Arise that had backchannelled to BIMC, but specifically the Green
Party officers. During what was the only uncensored portion of
the discussion with BIMC and the Greens (because I used the pseudonym
"lark") we have this exchange:
LARK:
Officer Tarpey joined the
Arise Listserv under no false pretenses. The
reason his list membership is being questioned is because Michaelann
Bewsee and Holly Richardson took offense to the fact that this list
member informed the target (Department of Transitional Assistance) of
an Arise picket that would be targetting them.
It is
wholly
inappropriate that members of the Indymedia are allowing a
hate and smear campaign to take place against this honest and
forthright public servant who has disclosed in advance the nature of
his participation Arise Listserv.
Somehow,
a user with a
vested interest in waging this smear campaign
believes he is standing up for Pete L. and David Rolde have made a huge
issue of this in the Arise list because of Pete's arrest at the Israeli
Protest. Indymedia is unwise to allow Pete and David to repost this
disinfomation here. They have crossposted it to several anarchist
listservs, and have left intact that Indymedia is running the story.
Since Indymedia has centered the story, and knows these people, they
can be held responsible for any false or misleading information printed
here. Also, it is just bad journalism.
If
anyone doubts that
Pete and David are not responsible for
anonymously crossposting their campaigns here and in the Arise
Listserve, they can visit this link. [Arise]
YO: (BIMC)
An infiltration of activist
groups by police officers, whether open or
undisclosed, is a clear violation of First Amendment Rights. In the
very least it's an a threating act towards those who participate in the
group and it's a well-known tactic from the FBI dating back to the
60s--although mostly done undercover.
If
Phil Tarpey used
evidence against one of the group members obtained
during his "participation" in the above group, it amounts to spying on
them.
The
targeting of peace
groups in California prompted the ACLU to file
Freedom of Information Act requests. From their website: "The
California Constitution prohibits this kind of infiltration without
some specific suspicion of criminal activity. Even if local law
enforcement officers are acting under the direction of the FBI or other
federal authorities, they are still bound by the privacy guarantees
embodied in this state's constitution."
I'm
sure the Mass.
constitution contains similar privacy guarantees, of
course unless, our beautiful Patriot Act obliterates such basic rights
like the right to (safe) assembly.
LARK:
Actually, it is not a
violation of First Amendment Rights. If you took
the time to visit the Arise listserv you would see that Tarpey is a
member of Arise and that no one in the group is claiming that their
rights to associate were violated. If anything, Tarpey has the right to
notify victims of a protest because he is not only a member of Arise
but a keeper of the peace.
He
cannot be accused of
spying if he used evidence against a member.
If there was evidence there was misbehavior. You are trying to argue
use of the First Amendment to protect criminal activity.
Your
frail grasp of
Cointelpro notwithstanding, the ACLU is not a
government organization, it is an interest group. The findings of
interest groups do not have legal force. But even if you were to demand
that there be suspicion of criminal activity, there are at least two
members of arise who meet that level of suspicion, including
"infiltrators" from socialist groups. Arise is from Springfield
Massachusetts, by the way, and not California.
If you
support democracy
and openness as you claim you do, you would
not make so much of an issue out of standard disagreements arising from
free association.
My solid refurbishment of Officer Tarpey's arguments once again drew
out the Green Party State's Rep candidate again, who was obviously
trying to make the most of his ambiguous membership / nonmembership in
Arise. Read, and enjoy his personality profile as you do.
Owen
Broadhurst:
Friends,
Given how no CD [civil disobedience] was discussed, or planned, in the
bulletin I did
forward - and how no public safety concerns arise from electronic or
written petitioning of public officials, as is the clear right of all
citizens - I must take issue with Officer Tarpey's arguments.
The mere suggestion that any given citizen's exercise of his or her
Goddess given right to petition public servants, Selectmen and/ or
District Attorneys for the redress of a grievance somehow presents a
public safety concern speaks volumes, I believe.
To furthermore suggest that such a petition might "adversely affect"
any legitimate function of the government also speaks volumes, I
believe, about what one believes the legitimate function of government
to be. To profess that it might "adversely affect" a "court procedure"
convened only via false arrest and/ or prosecutorial misconduct speaks
volumes about what one believes the legitimate function of our criminal
injustice system to be.
Therefore, yes, Officer Tarpey did indeed form an opinion. In his
opinion, the legitimate petitioning of public servants and public
officials presents a public safety concern.
Therefore, yes, Officer Tarpey did indeed make a suggestion. He
suggested, by the mere forwarding of my post, that it somehow
mystically presented a public safety concern.
How fairly and openly was I treated, or Pete treated? Officer Tarpey
never once communicated any concerns to me. Perhaps he realized then,
as he surely must now, that his views over what might or might not
present a public safety concern are views informed by his politics.
I must say that there were many public safety concern indeed related to
what I did to that list convey, but such concerns did not arise either
Pete's activities or my own. I say there was and is a public safety
concern over prosecutorial misconduct and prosecutorial powers
unchecked. I say there was and is a public safety concern regarding
erosions of the rights to petition and express dissent. I say there was
and is a public safety concern over subjecting activists operating well
within the law to false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious
prosecution. And I believe there now to be many public safety concerns
vis-a-vis CID.
Let me furthermore point out, in reply to misinformation recently
posted to this Boston IMC forum, that it was I, not Mr. Rolde, who made
a "big deal" out of this on the list noted. Mr. Rolde only but informed
list subscribers how the bulletin I posted was being employed, and by
whom. Let me make this also clear, contrary to false claims recently
made on this forum: that Officer Tarpey was in no way, shape or form
expelled from the list for his communications with the Department for
Transitional Assistance, but was expelled at my own request only for
this latest controversy. He had, in essence, identified yours truly,
Pete and nearly all concerned with Pete's welfare to be somehow
presenting "public safety" concerns relating to possible criminal or
terrorist activity. That is way out of line.
Sincerely yours,
Owen R. Broadhurst
Green-Rainbow Party Candidate for State Representative, Third Hampden
District
Green-Rainbow Party State Committee delegate, Hampden County
Green Party of the United States National Committee delegate,
Massachusetts
So here, stands your humble author, way out of the line drawn in red
crayon by the State's Rep of the Green Party. And around this
line I drew another one:
FLIPSIDE (no longer as lark):
David Rolde and BIMC editor
Sofia Jarrin-Thomas are Both in BOSTON
PROGRESS with Danny DiMaggio, Patrick Ayers, and Keith Rosenthal.
Michael Borucke who just joined BIMC is in Green Rainbows with David
Rolde. I have exposed the overlap of the local BIMC with the Green
Party and the Socialist Party operating out of Harvard University. This
is a conflict of interest. Sofia posted this to the center column
through BIMC back-channel involvement with political groups and is NOT
DOING NEWS. I am forwarding this information across the internet, as
well as the information that Owen Broadhurst who is trying to run for
State Representative has a goon squad from the Socialist Party.
--FLIPSIDE
Mike Gould-Wartofsky
Kelly Lee
Jake Carman
David Duhalde
Kaveri Rajaraman
<<FLASH FORWARD>> to Tuesday, October 17th., a week
after the October 10th ratfucking session where Jonathan McIntosh and
his ungrateful pet David Rolde had their lover's quarrel over Columbus
vs Judea. A can of fart spray in my pocket, I am off to 45 Mt.
Auburn St. to sit in on the communist circle jerk being thrown by
Harvard student Michael Gould-Wartofsky who I determined as being the
true
name for Boston Anarchist cell member "Shadowboxer" only after reading
approximately 200 of his communiques to every idiotic political group
he could join.
This meeting, one of many, all in fact which, are held at 45 Mt Auburn
St. Cambridge MA on the backside of Harvard Campus was held by the
Unspoken Thing Collective which is really Michael GW and his hand
picked assortment of campus communists. There were approximately
45 people in attendance, so I did not use the fart spray because of
group safety concerns, and because people kept coming in, many of which
I recognized and wanted to get more information on, and because I
forgot tape to keep the sprayer on. I was able to level off a few
stinky opinions instead, and this proved to be more amusing.
The event was a pan socialist networking event against
capitalism. The panel was: Chimaobi Amutah, Editor of Cambridge
Common, David Duhalde, Young Democratic Socialists, Kelly Lee,
anarchist activist, author & artist, Jake Carman, Industrial
Workers of the World & BAAM, Kaveri Rajaraman, Boston May Day
Coalition. In attendance were also a relative of Noah Hurowitz,
Operation Over, a communist Harvard professor, NEFAC, Josh Koritz of
BAAM, and Danny DiMaggio.
The panel discussion was pointless. Chimaobi 's speech was "I am
Chimaobi, I am black, I run a Harvard webpage." Kelly Lee's
speech was a very long monotone "Look at me I am brown, I am a dyke, I
have a vagina, nobody likes me, blah blah Maya Angelou." Jake
Carman's speech was "Capitalism sucks, join the Industrial Workers of
the World, it was great in 1917." "David Duhalde's speech was I
am the local chairman of the Young Democratic Socialists, I am half
jewish, my parents fled here from Latin America, Socialism is great
except we have a reputation for genocide. We should really fix
that." And Kaveri Rajaraman's speech was "Look at me, I have
brown skin, you have white skin, that makes you bad. I eat pussy
and am better for it. The world is an unfair place. Don't
buy Poland Spring water because the markup on water is unfair since
they take water out of the ground."
People were falling asleep. When the panel stopped droning on,
half of the people left, and the other half made a circle so they could
start jerking. But before the jerkfest, it is important to note
that BAAM Boston Anarchists Against Militarism aka Boston
Anti-Authoritaran Movement had a display table made of duct tape.
It was staffed by Josh Koritz, a local geek protege of Jane Sullivan
and George Bryant who suck at life out of the Revolution Bookstore
which is a front for the Communist Party USA. Josh Koritz is in
Socialist Alternative. He was sending pen click messages back and
forth to Danny DiMaggio, also of Socialist Alternative. Panelist
Kaveri Rajaraman is also from Socialist Alternative. So it was
that the allegedly non-denominational anti-capitalist panel discussion
was dominated by Socialist Alternative, IWW, NEFAC, and the usual
people claiming to be Zapatistas, with a Septagenarian Harvard
professor running interference for the Harvard based groups, and --
surprise, surprise -- BIMC Jonathan McIntosh "documenting" slash
participating.
When the circle started jerking there were the customary introductions
and the apologies for being white. Haters Magazine was the only
one to elicit the response "what?! magazine?" so I had to repeat my
introduction. I stayed at the discussion for about an hour,
during which several questions were raised. I was pleased to shut
down McIntosh, whose idea that we should get rid of capitalism and
replace it with consensus trading (communism) met with laughter when I
said I would not want to call a vote every time I ordered the Burger
King 99 c Whopper. This is in fact how BIMC makes it's food
decisions. The old professor got a little hot under the collar when I
said that Stalinism and socialism are constructively identical. I
can only imagine the "correcting" he does in class.
A clever black dude asked what socialists intend to do with the
majority of people who have no interest in socialism. A really
doofusy looking white kid with a pile of fluffy hair brainily assured
the room that no one is against socialism, because socialism is what
the people want. This gave me a vibe of Everybody Loves Raymond
meets 80's Reggae, and it didn't come off.
One kid ranted and raved for a few about how in capitalism every
transaction is a ripoff because it includes self interest.
Another very short kid said he was tired of discussion and wanted to do
something (ostensibly violent or damaging to property). The last
burning question was "Name a socialist society that lasted a long
time." Some 19 year old girl said "There is a community of people
trying to do this thing in San Francisco," so I knew it was my
cue to leave. In parting, I lobbed Jake Carman's idea of noble
savagery back at him, saying that yes, in fact a successful
civilization was arranged on that principle. It was The Mongols
under Genghis Khan and they could not produce anything for themselves,
which led them to maraud, rape, steal, murder, and pillage, and there
is socialism at it's best. Fart spray be damned.
Predictably, BIMC never did write up the meeting and whirl it into a
major success story for their front page. Jonathan McIntosh went
on to become Michael GW and Kelly Lee's personal photographer,
following them around on their Zapatista adventures around Boston,
being wannabe Mexicans and male lesbians, and shouting things at the
Park Plaza Hotel. Getting themselves thrown out of buildings,
anonymously writing big sob stories about police injustices they
experienced while being asked to stop trespassing into buildings and
ruining the free speech of others, and taking stong stands like "I
believe in free speech but not yours you are from the WTO" which is
essentially the motto of Indymedia, its Tupperware drum beat, and its
origin.
The two posts I have been running which are not popular at BIMC these
past two weeks are:
FLIPSIDE:
Dressing up as Ronald McDonald is the sign of a severe personality
disorder:
"The
personal pathway
model suggests that terrorists came from a selected at risk population
who have suffered from early damage to their self esteem. Their
subsequent political activities may be consistent with the liberal
social philosophies of their families."
--Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why
For example, Michael Gould-Wartofsky's mother Carol Gould is a
Marxist-Feminist professor at George Mason University, and his father
Marx Wartofsky was a philosopher at Baruch College. For this reason he
is unable to behave himself in public and is doomed to act out as a
disenchanted marxist-lesbian intellectual Jewish youth with a terrible
last name and a desire to be a Zapatista Rebel.
and ...
Indymedia Journalist Killed While
Trying to Destabilize Mexico
by Flipside
Indymedia member Brad Will was killed while trying to destabilize
Mexico. Now IMC is engaging in a racist smear campaign against Mexican
national, Pedro Carmona, who was only defending his country.
Industrial Workers of the World and Jake Carman are working closely
with BIMC in the effort to cover up criticism of Indymedia's
involvement in the Mexican Insurrection and to perform retaliatory acts
of symbolic outrage.
Mike Gould Wartofsky of Harvard, associate of Boston Indymedia Censor's
Jonathan McIntosh informed Jake Carman that Brad Will was his
"comrade." Two weeks before, Wartofsky was disturbing the peace outside
of the Mexican Consolate in Boston, and Wartofsky, McIntosh, and Carman
met to do Young People's Socialist League and Zapatista networking at
45 Mt. Auburn Street under the name "Unspoken Thing Collective."
IMC is quickly casting their blunder as an international conspiracy.
IMC member Reclaim the Commons is claiming that Mexico killed the
Indymedia 'journalist' as a pretext to kill other Zapatistas. They are
calling it an assassination and are planning attacks on Mexican
Consolates across the United States. They are being assisted by Eric
Ginsburg of Boston Indymedia Center.
The local EZLN is:
William Budington
Micah Lee
Nell Schaefer
Michael Gould-Wartofsky
Alex Telaraña
Sofia Jarrin-Thomas (BIMC)
Laura Colon-Melendez
It never ends. But I did get to add another fine BIMC letter to
my pile:
Jonathan McIntosh jonnyrebellious@gmail.com wrote:Re: [IMC-Boston-Editorial]
I think I beat flipside last night, in that I was deleting as fast as he was posting... i really really hate that guy. -Jonathan
HM
DISCLAIMER:
First of all, everything I said in this article is true. I
exaggerated only on BIMC's burger buying methods, of which I have no
clue. I don't particularly care about Palestinians or
Israelis. Let 'em kill each other. Archbishop Desmond Tutu
told me they are running an apartheid regime in Israel, and I take his
word for it. In case no one knew, he's an expert on
apartheid. Norman Finkelstein writes that Israel is just macking
the Holocaust in order to get money and kill their neighbors. I
have seen infomercials for it. I commemorated Rachel Corrie in
the song
"Intensity" on my album The People of Paradise. I believe she
genuinely thought that an Israeli bulldozer operator has a
conscience and wouldn't kill Americans, especially a girl. It was
an admittedly stupid assumption. I do not extend my sympathy to
every other one time member of ISM, including Pete Lowney. Fuck
him. He's a jackass. I am not particularly interested in
the Massachusetts State Police's
"Fusion Center," officer Phil Tarpey, the good intentions of the
Lexington Police force, or their leaky barrel of human
intelligence. I do think the Green Party sucks ass. I am
not angry because BIMC rebuffed my membership. I "joined" BIMC as
an insult to them because of their closed/open policy conflict. I
do believe that the agencies cringing behind BIMC are criminal
douchebags and none of them true rap fans. Now you know my true
feelings.
