| IDEAS |
Cybernetic Nietzscheans                                                          by
                                                                                                        


The purpose of this writing is informally to describe and endorse an expressly Nietzschean mode of offensive behavior. Building upon some of the worst fears within the leftist community, I do intend to continue development of an entity (me) which existed prior to the analyses and deconstructions of their most prominent theorists.  I shall draw exclusively upon the chapter "Trasformismo from Gramsci to Dick, or the Spectacular Technoculture of Everyday Life" from the book Nietzsche's Corpse, written by the Duke University Communist Geoff Waite, whose badly written book I did deliberately endure for the purpose of extracting his rendition of Nietzsche's ghost to amplify in this work.

I shall start out by saying that I do not believe Geoff Waite invented much.  He watched several bad movies, read several bad books, perhaps euphorically sucked a few dicks, and then set about repackaging the experience as another twisted but banal capitalist commodity, namely a block of paper stamped "Communism."  He is a homosexist butcher of the english language, an amplifier for the crippled and troglodyte economic theories of the late 19th century, and above all, not a clear or concise writer.  To the nanominded, this reflects poorly upon myself for purchasing his book -- a book I ripped as I read. However, I believe it was written about me.  Who can resist reading an unauthorized biography?

I am the buyer of the book Nietzsche's Corpse.  In it, I (as Nietzsche's Corpse) am accused of perpetrating a grand hoax upon the Left.  Waite's rough description of my character is:  Microphallic (chuh!), Esoteric, Unwitting, Sexist, Protofascist, and Cybernetic.  But how can I say that Waite describes me?  As the lector, that is the intended recipient of the text, l'outre, the other, I am that indeed.  Where Waite hates himself for being a Nietzschean, he hates all who are Nietzschean, and he does so with a projected self-loathing, an unwashable dirtiness, a yeast infection.  Where Waite resorts to any and all devices to project his lover's-hatred and assert his invert's will, he is blinded to the identity of his opponent.  I shall make use of this blindness and engage in some mandatory ridicule.

Let us dismiss a few hunks of junk which now clutter this writing:  "Spectacular Technoculture of Everyday Life."  I did not pour through Waite's dismembered endnotes, so I don't know who he burgled that cliche from.  I am not online, so I shall not type it in, subtract Waite's name from the keywords and find out that way.  'Nuff time wasted.  People have a lot of gadgets.  The statement is true.  It is a boring subject.  "Gramsci," an idiot communist anarchist who spent most of his life in a prison for trying to destroy economies, and issuing threats.  He is done.  His button is popped out.  Forget him.  "Phillip K. Dick"  Great guy.  Good science fiction writer.  A producer with the good sense to create an endowment for other producers, thereby ensuring new lines of product.  "Trasformismo," the ideological transformation effected by a nonchiasmic, nonreciprocal, venous ray of thought substitutions.  Interesting.

The Nietzschean spectre conjured and attacked by Waite has these characteristics:  Loquatious, Devious, Opportunistic, Apodictic, Egoist, Penile, Masculine, Preemptive, Transformative, Prescient, Poisonous to assimilate.  Waite prescribes an antidote:  someone Garrulous, Relentless, Defiled, Inclusive, Altruist, Castrated, Reactive, Fugitive, Romanticist, Retroviral.  In short, he prescribes an alternate disease, a laudanum, an herpes, an AIDS.

Returning to the main subject "to describe and endorse an expressly Nietzschean mode of offensive behavior" using Waite's Nietzschean specter as an additional template overlaid upon that of Myself [and] of Nietzsche.  A blurring of the line separating the three.  Date of Waite's publication: 1998.  Date of myself, 1973.  Precession of Nietzsche to myself.  Precession of myself to the Nietzschean simulacrum generated by Waite.  (Precession of the Simulacra by Jean Baudrillard.  Read it.)  Precession of Self to Self '  as an eigenvalue or a transformation series.  Inherent trasformismo within a human self and the irreversability or lack of interchangeability between new model Self and previous model Self.

Much which ought to be explained here I gloss over.  This fulfills Waite's allegation of the existence of an esoteric semiotic.  My assertion: that human motivation is at root a semi-closed (as in lasers) amplification of irrational impulse patterns, networked perhaps unburdens the semiotic.  Each man is an oubliette containing the reverberating nonsense of a larger outside universe.  His physical limitations give form to the expression of that nonsense.  The rectification of that nonsense into hierarchy and actionable directives is the basis of Will, and ultimately the strongest man has authority.  Thus sayeth I, author and man.

Flowing from this is the necessary distancing of men from women.  Women do NOT conceive of things in this way.  They conceive of things similarly, but with a greater tendency to placate, harmonize and protect the eggs from being damaged.  Women are more likely to believe Christianity or Socialism since women are more prone to forgive, or to see that resources are distributed equitably.  By and large men are concerned with winning promptly by direct aggression the most amount of resources, and doling them out to his mate and offspring.  The opponents of this particular aspect of overt Nietzschean offensive behavior include The Church and The Commune.  The Church takes control of the sexual gate by which finance is rerouted to the basket via the promise of deferred but greater pleasure.  The Commune eradicates the division between men and women and between parents and children, rerouting the fruits of sex, finance, and reproduction into the basket of Greater Good, which is then always stolen by the wiliest member of the Commune.

A general axiom of Nietzscheanism is that division is good, hierarchy is great, and I am excellent.  Let's thump a little voltage through this.

Division is essential to mitosis.  Growth is based on division.  To be divisive is to cause growth to take place.  To be divisive does not necessitate holding resentment, rebellion and revolution.  Joyous, horrific divisiveness can be administered from top to bottom.

Hierarchy is essential to organisms.  There is no organism of significant competitive status to that which has three brain sections organized hierarchically.  Anarchy in a brain can be acheived by blunt trauma, or penetration by ballistics, or microwave radiation.  Goop is a default state of matter.

Self is essential to a man.  A Self of Magnitude is essential to Overman. Ownership is essential to self, literally "being one's own."  Communal ownership of "one" by a collective eradicates man and replaces him with a cyborg.  Eradication of collectives or pilfering of collectives by Overman makes Overman a cyborg as well.  A fight ensues between the human collectivized cybernetic model and the lone actor cybernetic model.  The present, our century, the 21st, is a case of proto and cybernetic warfare.  Futurism is obsolete. We are in the era for which Nietzsche encapsulated his text.  We Nietzscheans are the preemptive strikers, information warriors, cybernetic lone actors embedded in the collectivised cybernetic models, also smoking pipes in high backed chairs outside the collectivized cybernetic models, also physical embodiments of collectivized cybernetic models, and transient features supervening upon collectivized cybernetic models.  This places us inside, outside, through, above, and askew the collectivized cybernetic model.  Any one particular position is an avatar, and we rulers use avatars interchangeably.  Oppenheimer did not know the half of it.

Shrink this entire discussion.  Author and reader standing in a blank whitespace like Morpheus and Neo, minus Higher Learning, Point Break, Buddhism, Luddism, Zion, Karma, and Historical Materialism.  Both pills do the same thing.  Upload a throne instead of an easychair.  Upload and combine Hassan i Sabah, Manu, Terminator, 1984, Abu Ghraib, Jabberwocky, Pinhead, Darth Vader, Ra of Stargate, Kahlil Gibran, Zod, Muad'dib, Clockwork Orange.  Seat him on this throne and let the spiderlike mechanical insects crawl upon his face and body as he recites the Riddle of Steel and Eternal Recurrence of the Same.  Let his voice sound like Valkyries emitting beams from Star Trek Phasers.  Let his voice level buildings.  And let it be me.  Let the word "Ridiculoos" turn commies into gothic fairies in feather boas.  Right hand Gryffindor, Left hand Slytherin.  Everyone else a Hufflepuff.  This is the essence of Nietzscheanism.

Megalomania pulled off -- is a mode of expressly Nietzschean offensive behavior. 

Make it so! 
Captain Walker carries Mister Dead in his pocket. 
Today is your lucky day -- You own a plane. 
Bust a deal, face the wheel! 
Who run Bartertown? 

Etc. etc. etc.  These are the good slogans and questions. 

Solidarity!
Question Authority
Dude, who stole my country?

and the problematiques of departmental socialism are not the good slogans or questions.  But we shall consider one question asked by Waite:

"Fascism?"  Waite asks this.  But can anybody answer the question CHARLIE GORDON?  Only Charlie can.  To cohere:  On which television channel does Nietzsche exist in his most rectified signal?  Meaning, the signal as in "Videodrome" or "They Live."  Waite wants to put a channel block on that one.  Use the "C chip" as it were.  No dice.  Nietzsche is television.  Is Amazon.com.  Is Netflix.  Am I using the term Nietzsche a little too loosely here, a little to much like "God."  How shall I use the term?  How shall I use myself?  How shall I use the rhetorical trope of deconstructionism?  Is it mine to use?  Is anything which is "one's own" also necessarily Self?  Can fascism answer the question "Fascism?"  Is it's answer "it's own" and therefore I.T./Self?  Coherence requires entanglement.  Refinement requires milling, stratification, packaging and shelving.  Include "Box" from Logan's Run on the aformentioned throne.

But I ramble.

To make the end of this writing more closely resemble the beginning of this writing and thereby to affect a conclusion, I will endorse a few more expressly Nietzschean modes of offensive behavior which exemplify a few more projected fears of Geoff Waite.  All who come in contact with Nietzschean writings become Nietzscheans, or else resolve to avoid reading his writings henceforth for fear of becoming Nietzscheans.  Simultaneous next thought: 1) Such is not true of the writings of Karl Marx. 2) thus I echo Ecce Homo. 

Self Diagnostic:

Cyborg? Si. Protofascist? No.  Fascist: Behaving in an authoritarian manner?  Yes.  State Fascist?  No.  Fascist of one's own internal states? Yes. Tendency to inflict one's own internal states upon others? Yes.  Tendency to compare The State with one's own State of Being?  Always.  Tendency to make one's own state of being a feature of The State?  Absolutely.  Therein the explanation for looking down upon Reichsdeutsch composers and Reichsdeutsch existentialists, but not upon imperialism.  Apparent conservation of Final Cause and Historical Materialism in that empire's tendency to produce Great Men leads to the belief that the purpose of civilization is to rise and fall in order to produce Great Men at the expense of vastly many others.  Charming, but a noble lie behind which I, Nietzschean do merrily own and operate heavy equipment.

Lokian, Shivaic, Hermetic. Mischief, persistent creative destruction, and a messenger service on winged heels.  Jim Morrison and the Doors.  Jason and the Argonauts.  Achilles and the Myrmidon. Wu Tang and the Killer Bees.  All are transformative toward the Bigger, the post-Dead, the dopest.  At minimum a story, a lyric, a song, at maximum an immortal.  At medium a drive, an impulse, a machine, a vehicle. 

Maxims: 

What heals can also kill. 
Show me the money. 
I am the new art. 
Live and let die.
I want more life, fucker.  (Add some sayings of your own).

The best quote from Nietzsche's Corpse was:  "the more peculiar problem, at least for genuine communism, is that almost anywhere one goes these days --  home or abroad, high culture or low -- some more or less 'traditional,' more or less 'cyborg' version of Nietzsche's corps/e lies ready and waiting."

That's true, fucker.  And the best part is you only just figured that out.